Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:07:52 -0400
From: "Michael Walsh" <MJW at press.jhu.edu>
To: <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Gilliland Fliers
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>

> dicconf at radix.net 10/26/2006 9:55:28 AM >>>
>
>On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Ted White wrote:
>
>> dicconf wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>>
>>>  For those of us who felt uncomfortable about blackguarding
>Alexis
>>>  behind his back, he indicated that Lee is tracking on the WSFA e-
>mail
>>>  exchanges and is pretty unhappy about it, but no more.
>>
>> What this means is that Alexis is *not* reading the lists, and *is*
>> relying on Lee to accurately relay what is said.  Want to take a
>guess
>> on her accuracy?  (Hint: check his chronology of events in his
flier,
>as
>> it refers to this list.)
>
>I feel dubious about the accuracy of several parties to this argle-
>bargle,
>not to put too fine a point on it.

Based upon what I know, I have no reason to disbelieve the statements
made by Cathy Green and Mike Nelson in response to Alexis's comments.

Based upon what I know, I have no reason to disbleive the statements
made by Ted and Keith in File 770 in reaction to Alexis's published
letter in the previous issue.

mjw