From: <lees103 at verizon.net>
To: "WSFA members" <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Greg Bear added to book signing on the 20th
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:09:38 -0400
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>
Yes, WSFA is one of the sponsors of the Reiter's Book Signing and
Discussion -- same as the last two years. It's mentioned on the WSFA.org
webcalendar. The event is open to everyone.
There were a number of other WSFAns present at Ravencon but I guess they
chose to remain anonymous. Cathy, Sarah and Bill hosted a very nice
Capclave party on Saturday night. And I invited a number of attendees to
come to WSFA and/or Capclave.
Shortly before I left on Sunday afternoon, I asked the Con Registrar
about attendance and she said that there were about 350 attendees. However,
that was not a final figure.
Lee
----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl at KeithLynch.net>
To: "WSFA members" <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:59 PM
Subject: [WSFA] Re: Greg Bear added to book signing on the 20th
> Samuel Lubell <samlubell at verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> I just found out that Greg Bear will be able to participate in the
>> book talk and signing we are doing at Reiter's Scientific Books on
>> May 20th!
>
> Thanks. This is the first I've heard of this. Is this a WSFA event?
> If so, is it open to everyone, or just WSFA members?
>
> I can find nothing about it at reiters.com or at wsfa.org.
>
> I missed you at Ravencon last weekend. There were a lot fewer past
> and present WSFAns there than last year. I saw all three Gillilands,
> James Uba, Erwin "Filthy Pierre" Strauss, Bill Lawhorn, Brian Lewis,
> Sarah Mitchell, Cathy Green, Lee Strong, David Bartell, and of course
> the con chair, Mike Pederson, and myself. That's it. And not a
> single PRSFS member other than myself. There were relatively few
> other non-local fans, either. But there was a good turnout of locals.
> I think total attendance was about 700.
>
> I didn't know that David Bartell was a WSFAn until after the con,
> when we continued our conversation about physics via email.
>
> Will you be at Balticon?
>