Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 23:03:54 -0800 (PST)
From: Tamar Lindsay <dicconf at yahoo.com>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: gah! let's try that again - Re: google word list
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>

On Mon, 12/20/10, Ted White <twhite8 at cox.net> wrote:=0A> Keith F. Lynch wro=
te:=0A>>=A0 "Michael Walsh" <mjw at press.jhu.edu>=0A>> wrote:=0A>>=0A>>> Too =
many pages to proofread would be=0A>>> they're argument I would imagine.=0A=
>>=0A>> There's a great shortage of proofreaders=0A>> everywhere.=0A> =0A> =
At least one of whom would point out that=0A> it should be "their argument.=
"=0A=0AWhich Keith did, at least on my system,=0Aby underlining the word wi=
th =0Aa row of ^^^^ marks.=0A=0A=Tamar=0A=0A=0A