Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:16:37 -0500
From: "Michael Walsh" <mjw at press.jhu.edu>
To: "WSFA members" <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: gah! let's try that again - Re: google word list
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>

> Tamar Lindsay <dicconf at yahoo.com> 12/20/2010 2:03 AM >>>
>On Mon, 12/20/10, Ted White <twhite8 at cox.net> wrote:=0A> Keith F. Lynch =
wro=
>te:=0A>>=A0 "Michael Walsh" <mjw at press.jhu.edu>=0A>> wrote:=0A>>=
=0A>>> Too =
>many pages to proofread would be=0A>>> they're argument I would =
imagine.=0A=
>>>=0A>> There's a great shortage of proofreaders=0A>> everywhere.=0A=
> =0A> =
>At least one of whom would point out that=0A> it should be "their =
argument.=
>"=0A=0AWhich Keith did, at least on my system,=0Aby underlining the =
word wi=
>th =0Aa row of ^^^^ marks.=0A=0A=Tamar=0A=0A=0A

Ted's email reader stripped out Keith's  ^^^^^ and your email reader =
doesn't play well with Keith's email system.

Gotta love computer standards, there are so many of them <g>.

mjw