Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:23:03 -0500
From: Ted White <twhite8 at cox.net>
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: gah! let's try that again - Re: google word list
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>

On 12/20/2010 9:16 AM, Michael Walsh wrote:

> > Tamar Lindsay <dicconf at yahoo.com> 12/20/2010 2:03 AM >>> On Mon,
> > 12/20/10, Ted White <twhite8 at cox.net> wrote:=0A> Keith F. Lynch =
>  wro=
> > te:=0A>>=A0 "Michael Walsh" <mjw at press.jhu.edu>=0A>> wrote:=0A>>=
>  =0A>>> Too =
> > many pages to proofread would be=0A>>> they're argument I would =
>  imagine.=0A=
> >>> =0A>> There's a great shortage of proofreaders=0A>>
> >>> everywhere.=0A=
> > =0A> = At least one of whom would point out that=0A> it should be
> > "their =
>  argument.=
> > "=0A=0AWhich Keith did, at least on my system,=0Aby underlining the
> > =
>  word wi=
> > th =0Aa row of ^^^^ marks.=0A=0A=Tamar=0A=0A=0A
>
>  Ted's email reader stripped out Keith's ^^^^^ and your email reader
>  doesn't play well with Keith's email system.
>
>  Gotta love computer standards, there are so many of them <g>.

Actually, *I* stripped them, because as soon as the line length changed
they no longer underlined the appropriate word.  Frankly, I thought they
were just some strange artifact.

Like those odd equal signs which get distributed through your text at
line-ends.  I'd clean up your quote, but frankly I don't know where to
begin.

--Ted White