Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:05:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Tamar Lindsay <dicconf at yahoo.com>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: gah! let's try that again - Re: google word list
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>

--- On Mon, 12/20/10, Mike B. <omni at omniphile.com> wrote:

> On 12/20/2010 9:16 AM, Michael Walsh
> wrote:
> >> Tamar Lindsay<dicconf at yahoo.com>
> 12/20/2010 2:03 AM
>>>

<snip most of the mess>

> > Ted's email reader stripped out Keith's  ^^^^^
> > and your email reader =
> > doesn't play well with Keith's email system.
> >
> > Gotta love computer standards, there are
> > so many of them<g>.
>
> Not sure, but Tamar may be sending "quoted printable"
> text,  and Keith's  anti-HTML rules may not deal well
> with them.  Wild guess only...

Just to clarify:

In point of fact, the subject line ("gah!" etc.)
refers to my second post, in which I took care to
create an entirely new post, cutting and pasting
what I quoted through Notepad in order to strip
whatever it is that made a mess like that happen
when I tried a direct response.
My second post appeared just fine onscreen.

Then Mike Walsh quoted what I typed, and I assume
it was his system interface that threw in the hash.

I do my best not to post in html even by quotation,
but occasionally I make the mistake of trying to
do a simple "reply."

=Tamar