Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 21:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tamar Lindsay <dicconf at yahoo.com>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: dialysis age, Tackling concerns of independent workers
To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>

Keith Lynch:=0ADo you have a cite for that?  According to=0Ahttp://www.nhs.=
uk/conditions/Dialysis/Pages/Introduction.aspx=0A"Most people who have dial=
ysis are over 65 years of age."=0A=0A=0A--- On Sat, 3/30/13, Mike B. <yahoo=
 at omniphile.com> wrote:=0A=0A> From: Mike B. <yahoo at omniphile.com>=0A> Subje=
ct: [WSFA] Re: dialysis age, Tackling concerns of independent workers=0A> T=
o: "WSFA members" <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>=0A> Date: Saturday, March 30, 2=
013, 12:29 AM=0A> On 3/29/2013 10:43 PM, Tamar Lindsay=0A> wrote:=0A> >> "M=
ost people who have dialysis are over=0A> 65"=0A=0AWell, of course - if=
 you==0A> >=A0=A0=A0deny it to anyone under that age, the=0A> ones who ge=
t it will be over that ag==0A> > e.=A0 The statement says nothing about=
 people who need=0A> it but don't get to ==0A> > have it.=0A=0A=Tam=
ar=0A=0A=0A> >=0A> =0A> Who are you quoting?=A0 I didn't see a message =
with that=0A> statement in it =0A> until I saw your message.=0A> =0A> My or=
iginal message had this:=0A> =0A> "Ok, I guess health care triage where the=
y tell those over a=0A> certain age =0A> =A0 (56 in one report) who needs d=
ialysis that they can't=0A> have dialysis =0A> because there aren't enough =
machines and they are being=0A> reserved for =0A> those with more life ahea=
d of them is ok with you?=A0=0A> (That was the UK in =0A> case you were won=
dering)."=0A> =0A> Which says exactly the opposite of what you are quoting,=
 so=0A> I don't =0A> think it was me.=0A> =0A> -- Mike B.=0A> =0A>