Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:59:22 -0400
From: mark <whitroth at 5-cent.us>
To: wsfa-forum at yahoogroups.com
CC: Merimde <Merimde at yahoo.com>, WSFA members <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>
Subject: [WSFA] Re: [wsfa-forum] News you want to hear about the shutdown....
Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net>

On 10/10/13 18:28, Merimde wrote:
e> Can we stop one upping each other over this shutdown. It sucks. But if=

you want to argue or whatever please can we do it somewhere else. Otherwi=
se
I am not sure I want to stay on this list serve. It serves no point or
relation to wsfa topics.
>
Sure. I'll quit now. If Mike B, or anyone, wants to continue, they can em=
ail
me directly.

mark

> Jenney
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 10, 2013, at 6:22 PM, "Mike B." <yahoo at omniphile.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10/10/2013 5:52 PM, mark wrote:
>>> On 10/10/13 17:39, Mike B. wrote:
>>>> On 10/10/2013 2:38 PM, mark wrote:
>>>>> I was at a rally downtown this morning, here in DC, set up by the
>>>>> House Progressive Caucus, and one of the speakers... Nancy
>>>>> Pelosi, maybe... announced that, as of this morning, all but 300
>>>>> of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's employees are now
>>>>> furloughed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, and so is most of the FAA, so no one is inspecting planes
>>>>> for air-worthiness, checking that pilots and crew have enough
>>>>> rest, and Boeing's got planes to deliver... and they're sitting
>>>>> on the ramp, because there's no one to inspect them.
>>>>
>>>> Aircraft inspections are done by A&P mechanics, who are certified
>>>> by the FAA for signing off on the airworthiness of aircraft.  The
>>>> FAA sets the standards, and tests applicants for certifications,
>>>> but doesn't handle inspection of each and every aircraft at each
>>>> and every inspection...and airliners don't get inspections at
>>>> periodic intervals like your average private plane...they are
>>>> handled under on-going maintenance plans as certified by the FAA at
>>>> the time they are set up.
>>>>
>>>> So who told you Boeing can't deliver an aircraft because the FAA
>>>> was closed?
>>>
>>> I don't remember if it was a Congressman, or someone who works for
>>> the FAA. He said they can't inspect the aircraft, so they're not
>>> certified yet. And the FAA ain't signing off on *anything*, because
>>> of lack of staff.
>>
>> Then lets gets some facts, and lose the hear-say:
>>
>> http://www.faa.gov/aircraft/air_cert/airworthiness_certification/aw_ov=
erview/
>>
"Who is authorized to issue an FAA airworthiness certificate?
>> Only FAA Aviation Safety Inspectors and authorized Representatives of
>> the Administrator (i.e.Designees), as defined in 14 CFR Part 183,
>> "Representatives of the Administrator", are authorized to issue an FAA=

>> airworthiness certificate."
>>
>> http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?c=ecfr&SID=ed24b875afec269ddb=
d81b9bf1629f60&rgn=div8&view=text&node=14:3.0.1.5.33.3.3.7&idno=1=
4
>>
"Title 14: Aeronautics and Space
>> PART 183=97REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ADMINISTRATOR Subpart C=97Kinds of
>> Designations: Privileges =A7 183.33   Designated Airworthiness
>> Representative.
>>
>> A Designated Airworthiness Representative (DAR) may, within limits
>> prescribed by and under the general supervision of the Administrator,
>> do the following:
>>
>> (a) Perform examination, inspection, and testing services necessary to=

>> issue, and to determine the continuing effectiveness of, certificates,=

>> including issuing certificates, as authorized by the Director of
>> Flight Standards Service in the area of maintenance or as authorized b=
y
>> the Director of Aircraft Certification Service in the areas of
>> manufacturing and engineering.
>>
>> (b) Charge a fee for his or her services.
>>
>> (c) Perform authorized functions at any authorized location.
>>
>> (Secs. 313(a), 314, 601, 603, 605, and 1102, Federal Aviation Act of
>> 1958, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1355, 1421, 1423, 1425, and
>> 1502); sec.6(c) Department of Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)))
>>
>> [Doc. No. 23140, 48 FR 16179, Apr. 14, 1983, as amended by Amdt.
>> 183-9, 54 FR 39296, Sept. 25, 1989; Amdt. 183-11, 67 FR 72766, Dec. 6,=

>> 2002]"
>>
>> So, unless Boeing has neglected to employ, and can not locate a
>> non-government employee "Designee" with the appropriate
>> certification(s) to do the airworthiness inspections, there's nothing
>> about the FAA shutdown that interferes with them getting airworthiness=

>> certificates for new aircraft so they can sell them.
>>
>> The design of the aircraft was certified before manufacturing
>> started...the FAA supervises that process, but Boeing performs
>> it...basically they have to build prototypes and then put them through=

>> a long and costly set of tests and trials to show they meet FAA
>> standards. That happens before production starts.
>>
>> The production process is also certified by the FAA, but performed by
>> Boeing.  Every step and material and material source is specified,
>> tested and approved, and must be adhered to for the resulting produced=

>> aircraft to be covered by the above design testing and certification.
>>
>> Once you get all that done you can build aircraft.  Each one has to be=

>> certified as airworthy, but not by FAA personnel necessarily, as the
>> above FAA regulation quotes show.
>>
>> The FAA doesn't have nearly enough personnel to handle all the
>> aircraft in the USA even if it wanted to.  Any time maintenance (beyon=
d
>> pilot tasks like adding engine oil or putting air in the tires) is don=
e
>> on an aircraft the airworthiness certificate becomes invalid until a
>> certified A&P (or similar for instruments and electronics) tech signs
>> the aircraft log book certifying that it is airworthy.
>>
>> It's all in the FAA regulations, which are available on-line and in
>> book form.  No need to listen to congressmen or random FAA employees.
>>
>> -- Mike B.
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>

--
"I am glad to know that there is a system of labor where the laborer can
strike if he wants to. I wish to God that such a system prevailed all ove=
r
the world." - Abraham Lincoln, speech, Mar. 5, 1860