Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 15:31:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl at KeithLynch.net> To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at KeithLynch.net> Subject: [WSFA] Re: Fwd: Hellboy set visit with MTV Reply-To: WSFA members <WSFAlist at keithlynch.net> Elspeth Kovar <ekovar at worldnet.att.net> wrote: > Er, doesn't this count as spam? I don't think so. It is commercial, but I don't think it's bulk. * It relates to SF, fantasy, or science. * It was emailed to our correct club contact address, rather than to addresses set up for some other purpose, or to all WSFA members. * We only got one copy. * It implies that the sender knows we're an SF club. * The headers weren't forged. * The product didn't appear to be fraudulent. * In more than a 24 hours, nobody had reported it to the news.admin.net-abuse.sightings newsgroup as spam. * It was from a reputable company (Sony Pictures). * It was the sort of thing we might have gotten via snail mail and published in our Journal. * I thought it might be of interest to some WSFA members. These are the criteria I use. What's the consensus? Should I continue to forward such messages to the list? Should I forward them to Sam to print in the WSFA Journal? Or should I just ignore them? There are lots of borderline case. On the 20th, I got an email from "Phobos Books" addressed to "Dear Editor:" touting an SF novel from a "Phobos Award Winner" whom I had never heard of, and offering us a review copy. I chose not to forward it. (Would anyone like to see it?) Today, I got a message forwarded by Judy Kindell, touting a local writing workshop. I replied, reminding her that the address she sent to went only to me, and giving her the address of this list. I won't forward a message to this list *from a WSFA member*, since I assume that if they meant to send to this list they would have done so, rather than writing only to me. I will remind them of the list, and the fact that they don't have to subscribe to post to it. Every day there are hundreds of very NON-borderline cases, outright spam, which I ignore even when my filters don't block it. I used to try to report it, but finally gave that up when it consumed nearly *all* my free time, with no signs of progress. (If you've been paying close attention to when I've been placing old WSFA Journals online, you might have noticed that after I started, in April 2000, I went slower and slower, until I put none at all online for over a year. That's the year I sacrificed nearly all my free time to attempting to save email. Finally, I conceded that email was doomed. I give it another two years. Maybe three at the most. Then we'll have to go back to snail mail.) -- Keith F. Lynch - kfl at keithlynch.net - http://keithlynch.net/ I always welcome replies to my e-mail, postings, and web pages, but unsolicited bulk e-mail (spam) is not acceptable. Please do not send me HTML, "rich text," or attachments, as all such email is discarded unread.